Access Keys:
Skip to content (Access Key - 0)
All CIMA spaces

CIMA

This space

9 - Ordered Scoring for Paramotors (POL)

compared with
Key
This line was removed.
This word was removed. This word was added.
This line was added.

Changes (5)

View page history
a. Is simple to carry on
b. Is easy to understand for the audience and pilots
c. Keeps competitors competitive until the very end of the competition, as getting an unrecoverable advantage over others is difficult
d. Equalizes the chance to get an edge over other competitors for pilots who are experts in a particular group of tasks: for example, in navigation or precision tasks differences between first few pilots is most often given in 1-2 digit number of task points, and rarely approaches close to 200 points. On the other hand, in economy tasks (only), it is possible for pilots flying good in thermal condition to reduce the score of majority competitors too, e.g. 20-30% of their score. Of course, thermal flying is a valuable skill and no doubt that better pilot should be awarded score higher than their competitors, although it is unfair that only economy tasks allow flattening the overall result of so many pilots. It is a kind of qui-pro-quo that possibility for such a significant advantage is given only to a paragliding expert in a paramotor competition. After all, CIMA governs a paramotor sport discipline rules, so either all kind of experts should be given a chance to flatten others scores, or none of the experts should have it.
d. Equalizes the chance to get an edge over other competitors for pilots who are experts in a particular group of tasks: for example, in navigation or precision tasks differences between first few pilots is most often given in 1-2 digit number of task points, and rarely approaches close to 200 points. On the other hand, in pure economy task (only), it is possible to reduce the score of majority competitors too, e.g. 20-30% of the maximum score. Thermal flying is a valuable skill and no doubt that better pilot should be scored higher than their competitors, although it is unfair that only pure economy task allows flattening the overall result of so many pilots. It is a kind of qui-pro-quo that possibility for such a significant advantage in a paramotor competition is given only to a paragliding expert. CIMA governs a paramotor sport discipline rules, so either all experts should be given a chance to flatten others scores, or none of the experts should have it.
e. The trend of choosing higher aspect ratio wings for FAI competitions, which fly better in thermals but are easier collapsing, will be diminished to the benefit of overall safety.

Simulations of TP to CP recalculation performed upon results from a few recent competitions, prove that winner and few top pilots remain the same positions regardless of the scoring system used. The best is still the best - which shows the ordered scoring is fair. The differences appear randomly in distant places. However, as I said before, the most significant benefit is that almost to every pilot competition remains exciting until the very last task. Almost always, it is possible to get a higher overall position if the pilot proves to be better then others in the task.
Simulations of TP to CP recalculation performed upon results from a few recent competitions, prove that winner and few top pilots remain the same positions regardless of the scoring system used. The best is still the best - which shows the ordered scoring is fair. The differences appear randomly in distant places. However, as said before, the most significant benefit is that almost every pilot remains involved in the competition until the very last task.

Adaptavist Theme Builder Powered by Atlassian Confluence