Access Keys:
Skip to content (Access Key - 0)
All CIMA spaces

CIMA

This space

27 = Economy tasks based on weight of pilot and machine

Proposal from

Paap Kolar / Estonia

Proposal title

Scoring economy tasks taking into account the weight of each pilot and their machine.

Existing text

S10 Annex 3
3.2.3 FUEL MEASUREMENT
Fuel will be measured by weight or volume but will be consistent for any given refueling session. Refueling will be in the order and in accordance with the instructions given at briefing. Failure of the aircraft to be present on time may result in penalty for the pilot.
Competitors must be able to demonstrate that their entire fuel system is empty.

New text

S10 Annex 3
3.2.3 FUEL MEASUREMENT IN TASKS WITH A FIXED FUEL QUANTITY

Fuel will be measured by weight or volume but will be consistent for any given refueling session. Refueling will be in the order and in accordance with the instructions given at briefing. Failure of the aircraft to be present on time may result in penalty for the pilot.
Competitors must be able to demonstrate that their entire fuel system is empty.

3.2.4 FUEL MEASUREMENT IN TASKS BASED ON WEIGHT OF FUEL USED FOR THE TASK

This is an alternative method of flying and scoring fuel economy tasks by:
- weighing pilots and machines (not the wing) before and after the flight to measure the amount of fuel used in the task.

- allowing pilots to carry as much fuel as they want, to ensure full task participation safely

- allowing application of "Average Weight Handicapping Index (AWHI)" to level the playing field between light and heavy pilots and machines.

For the purpose of scoring: One liter of fuel = 0.74kg = 740 grams

3.2.4.1 Weighing of pilots and machines before launch.

The weighing scale(s) must be capable of an accuracy of +/-20g, and must be located next to the launch deck. Several weighing scales should be prepared in case heavy classes are involved (for example 3 scales for PL2).
The pilots should only get weighed when they are intending to launch.
The combined pilot(s) + paramotor + all supplementary items is weighed, with the exception of the wing.
The wing must be detached from the carabiners and paramotor unit, and can be already prepared in the launch deck. Wing bags, if used, must either be carried by pilots when weighed or not be taken on the flight.

In PF classes pilots should carry the paramotor on his/her back, as well as all equipment and accessories when stepping up onto the scale.

In PL classes pilot(s) and equipment can be weighed separately and the result summarized.

If the pilot is moving too much on the scale, the readout will fluctuate and the highest value will be recorded.

The pilots should then proceed to their wing with a view to launch as soon as possible.

Marshals should ensure that pilots spend as little time as possible between the weighing and launching, and may demand for a pilot to be re-weighed if necessary. Any pilot (or equipment) leaving the deck must re-weighed before re-entering. Possible penalties will be briefed.

Marshals should ensure that pilots are not "ballasting" themselves by grabbing soil or stones as they get ready to launch.

3.2.4.2 Weighing of pilot and machine after landing.

As soon as a pilots lands back on the deck, a Marshal will direct them to the scale, to be weighed immediately. The wing is detached and as before, the combined pilot + paramotor + all supplementary items is weighed, with the exception of the wing.

Once more, Marshals should be vigilant with pilots not "ballasting" themselves with stones etc.
In case of any suspicion from the Marshal, he has the right to carry out a thorough investigation with corresponding penalties.

If the pilot(s) are moving too much on the scale, the readout will fluctuate and this time, the lowest value will be recorded.

3.2.4.3 Applying Average Weight Handicapping Index (AWHI).

Data of weighing the pilots and machines (POW = Pilot Overall Weight) before the first eco task will be used to calculate Absolute Average Weight (AAW) of the class (the summarized weight of all competing pilots and aircrafts in class divided by the number of crews in class).

To stimulate development of lighter engines and economy, the Absolute Average Weight (AAW) will be corrected upwards by 10 % to get Relative Average Weight (RAW) of the class for the scoring purposes. By discretion of Comp Director this percentage can be adopted for each competition and announced in the Task Catalogue or at opening briefing.

All pilots are then given a personal Average Weight Handicapping Index (AWHI), calculated from each pilot’s exact weight with machine (POW), divided with Relative Average Weight (RAW) of the class.

For example:
a) If AAW is 130 kg, RAW is 10 % more (110 % of AAW), which is 143 kg
With POW (Pilot Overall Weight) 122 kg:
POW 122 kg will be divided by AAW 143 kg = AWHI 0,853
(eg. With POW 140kg = AWHI 0,979 and with 85kg = 0.594)

b) If AAW is 140 kg, RAW is 10 % more (140 + 14), which is 154 kg
With POW (Pilot Overall Weight) 122 kg:
POW 122 kg will be divided by AAW 154 kg = AWHI 0,792
(eg. POW 140kg = AWHI 0,9 and 85kg = 0.55)

c) If AAW is 120 kg, RAW is 10 % more (120 + 12), which is 132 kg
With POW (Pilot Overall Weight) 122 kg:
POW 122 kg will be divided by AAW 132 kg = AWHI 0,92
(eg. POW 140kg = AWHI 1,06 and 85kg = 0.64)

Personal AWHI will be used in all scoring formulas throughout all eco tasks despite what method of fuel measurement has been used.

As a result, this method allows fair and easy scoring of eco tasks for all pilots regardless of their weight and the weight of their machines.

Reason

What are current problems with a traditional fueling method for eco tasks and their scoring?

Why it is unfair and not practical?

Physics

Pilots can choose which equipment they use but they cannot help greatly with their bodyweight. The heavier the pilot, the greater the fuel used.

NB! There is a common belief that heavier pilots gain in speed. This is not true as clearly evidenced in both flight theory and actual competition results. Pilots can choose a wing to give them an acceptable launch speed and speed range to meet the needs of the various tasks.

Fairness

The most importantly the traditional method of fuel weighing without any pilot and/or machine weight handicapping is unfair, especially towards heavier pilots because the amount of fuel given is similar to all pilots, regardless of the weight of pilot or machine.

Pilots with thirsty engines not only score badly but are also denied full task participation.

Emptying all tanks and bottles can be in some cases very complicated or even impossible.

Since fuel tank emptying, measurement and control will remain inaccurate, the result will be unfair even from the aspect of fuel amount used.

In cases where fuel systems can be emptied completely, refilling and restarting of the engine can be fuel consuming task itself, depending on the fuel management system in question.

There are numerous possibilities to go around the traditional method and to cheat, even after sealing all tanks and caps.

This proposal takes a step towards leveling the playing field and giving all pilots a more equitable chance to perform well in economy tasks.

Safety

Any kind of excessive operations with fuel should be avoided or minimized

Traditional method fuel management involves continuous emptying, measuring, weighing, storing, refilling, sealing, seal braking etc. throughout the whole competition

Pilots have to modify their machines with complicated and potentially dangerous fuel systems and header tanks which

  • have no operative or safety standards
  • are not approved by manufacturer, thus not conforming S10  (4.23.2 Airworthiness. Each aircraft shall be flown within the limitations of its certificate of airworthiness or permit to fly.)
  • have to be kept attached and unchanged for the whole period of competition, including navigation and precision tasks
  • will create unnecessary risks of leaking and fire hazard (http://les-droles-d-oiseaux.xooit.fr/t342-Accident-Tristan.htm)

Running machines empty with propellers rotating on the ground is dangerous not only to the pilot in command but also to to other competitors, organizers, public and the machine.

Running out of fuel in the middle of the task and landing out in unexpected conditions is dangerous. Almost every outlanding will end with retrieval.

Results of outlandings often include personal injury, damage to the aircraft or to the 3-rd parties.

Environment

The whole idea of eco tasks is to save fossil fuels, to develop this sport sustainably and to reduce an environmental impacts to the minimum.

Instead of saving fuel and taking care of environment the traditional fueling method is promoting:

  • fuel wasting while running engines empty
  • environment pollution by spilling fuel while filling, emptying, refilling, relocating, weighing, storing etc.
  • fire hazard in fuel management and in fueling systems management
  • noise pollution while running engines empty, especially at late hours.

Thus eco task management is probably wasting more than saving and creating additional environmental hazards.

Expenses

  • Building complicated comp bottles and fuel management systems with additional bottles, pumps, valves, tubing and fittings.
  • Providing extra special canisters by pilots.
  • Providing conditions for storage and guarantine by Organiser
  • Providing marshals for weighing, sealing, controlling etc. by Organiser
  • Conforming regulations of fire safety
  • Spilled fuel
  • Running machines empty with propellers rotating on the ground is dangerous not only to the pilot in command but also to the propeller blades and to the machine
  • Consequences of engine tuning, seizing, parts and repair
  • Wasted time
  • Consequences of noise while running engines empty
  • Landing out damages, injuries and retrieval with possible involvement of police, ambulance or medivac service

Time

Emptying machines of all fuel and weighing fuel with traditional method is a tedious exercise that wastes precious flying time.

For a small task of 15 minutes, hours of good weather and flyable time is wasted,  often time of one whole task.

An economy task cannot be set at short notice, thus planning by weather is uneffective.

Accuracy of measurement

There is always some fuel left in the system because emptying the machine of fuel cannot be carried out properly, especially in case of some specific comp bottle solutions.

This will make fuel measuring accuracy worthless because the result will be inaccurate, thus unfair from the aspect of fuel amount used.

Control

There is inconsistency in the way pilots are supervising each other's fueling and to get away with keeping some fuel in pipes (or priming bulb) is not really seen as cheating

Sealing tank caps is not effective enough and leaves numerous ways for cheating

Controlling of fuel systems is complicated and needs expertise

Task management

Exhausting task preparations for all parties involved.

Prevents adding an economy element to other tasks simple.

Scoring zero if forced to outland because lack of fuel.

With the proposed new fueling procedure it is only a simple modification in the formulae to compute the amount of fuel used in proportion to the POW (Pilots Overall Weight).

Fun factor

To gain popularity amongst pilots all over the world and to get more pilots to join competition activities, competition tasks should be enjoyable.

It is not fun to deal with fuel for several hours a day to fly a task of 15 minutes.

It is not fun to fly economy tasks knowing that light pilots with light machines will always be favored and for heavy pilots results will always be scored unfairly.

It is not fun to fly economy tasks to compete not for pilot skills but for engine consumption/performance and with unfair scoring.

Regulations

S10  4.23.2 Airworthiness. Each aircraft shall be flown within the limitations of its certificate of airworthiness or permit

to fly.

There is no manufacturer known to supply paramotors with comp bottles as a standard.

Any modifications made to the fuel system by pilot and not approved by manufacturer cannot conform with manufacturers specifications.

In front of law and S10 this makes all extra tanks and comp bottles illegal without proper certification.

EU regulations

In EU there are very strict regulations existing on handling, storing and management of flammable substances. There is a serious doubt that these EU and also local regulations have been ignored at many paramotor comps so far. Not following these regulations will get more and more difficult in time and can create huge legislative and financial risk for the organiser, NAC or FAI.

Why a new method is better?

Using a new method as an alternative to the traditional one will offer solution to all issues in all categories described above.

Fairness

New method is fair to every pilot, regardless his/her bodyweight

Less possibilities for cheating

Easier to control

Safety

No need to empty fuel systems

No running engines empty, no spilling

No outlandings and corresponding consequences

Task management

Task preparation and fuel management will be fast and effective
No need for quarantine zones

An economy task can be set at short notice

Any Nav or precision task can include a weigh-in at the launch deck and integration of eco elements becomes possible

Environment

Silent
No spilling

Time

Fast and effective

No tedious fueling sessions anymore

An economy task can be set at short notice

Accuracy of measurement

Accuracy is dependent on scale’s specifications and this can be solved easily these days, being just matter of technological solution.

Despite the fact that often scales used were not very accurate, there have been no complaints or protests towards this method and everybody involved so far were happy with this method.

The argument of sweating, often brought up against this new method, has actually very little to do with it because sweating is largely compensated here with Average Weight Handicapping Index (AWHI).

Simplicity

Simple to follow for competitors
Easy to implement for organisers
No need for quarantine zones

No need for pilots to modify their machines by fitting header tanks, extra pumps, etc

Fun factor

More time for flying

Eco tasks become more interesting, more fair, less stressful and frustrating

History

Proven positive history over the last 7 years internationally, even at FAI events like WPLC

Used successfully in many countries and in nearly 20 comps

Popular among pilots all over the world

One main concern of pilots to be improved at FAI comps

Physics (from physics book):

Power = Force x distance / time
1 watt = 1 newton x 1 metre / 1 second
When an aircraft is flying level, Lift equals Weight and Thrust = Drag
Therefore the thrust needed to fly level is equal to the weight divided by the Lift/Drag ratio (glide ratio).
Lift/Drag = Weight/Thrust
So Thrust = Weight / (Lift/Drag)
Power is the fuel used and Force is the thrust:
Fuel used = Weight / (L/D) x velocity
The ratio Lift / Drag is also equal to the ratio Horizontal Speed / Sink Rate

So we can also say that:
Fuel used = Weight x Sink Rate
The pilot can choose a wing with a good compromise of speed and sink rate, or a lightweight paramotor but he cannot change his bodyweight.
Weight is the enemy of economical powered flying.

In summary, fuel consumption is directly proportional to the total flying weight, and the new method is designed to level the playing field, to allow pilots of all weights an equal chance to perform in economy tasks.


Added by Paap KÕLAR Last edited by Richard Meredith-Hardy on 30 Sep, 2012 10:08. Quick links: http://wiki.fai.org/x/RQLk or 27 = Economy tasks based on weight of pilot and machine
Enter labels to add to this page:
Please wait 
Looking for a label? Just start typing.
Adaptavist Theme Builder Powered by Atlassian Confluence